Men
Dior Homme Original
Acordes principales
Descripción
Dior Homme Original by Dior is an aromatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2021, this composition was created by perfumer François Demachy. Its olfactive structure unfolds with a top note of Tuscan iris, a heart of Guatemalan cardamom, and a base of vetiver.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Tuscan Iris
-
Corazón
Guatemalan Cardamom
-
Base
vetiver
Comunidad
1,406 votos
- Positivo 91%
- Neutral 5.3%
- Negativo 3.8%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Dior Homme Original y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
25 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Original or not, this is the fragrance that keeps alive the essence of the original, the source of one of the best designer collections, transcending even in quality and innovation, with nothing to envy from many niche houses. I had the luck of trying the 2011 version for a couple of years before its space was usurped by the generic 2020 version, which has nothing to do with its predecessor. After that, I bought this, now renamed “Original”, and rest assured, it is essentially the same. I would like to clarify that it does indeed feel simpler, more watery olfactorily, so it makes sense that it has been simplified. It has clearly lost the leather, which is the biggest difference, but it retains its controversial and special iris note that dominates from start to finish, velveting over time. It is much fresher (not citrusy or aquatic, mind you) than its Intense and Parfum; the opening is not citrus but spicy and cardamom-driven, which fades to let the iris take centre stage. When this softens, a clean, non-earthly nuance emerges, blending with the soft iris dry-down: it is the vetiver, nothing shouty and playing a supporting role. The perception is the same as in the last 2011 formulations; for those who are not frequent users, it may seem identical, but the difference lies in the details: it is no longer that multi-layered fragrance, now it is flatter and more linear. Despite this, it is worth it: its longevity and projection are similar to the last batches of Dior Homme 2011, with moderate performance but acceptable staying power. The final days of the 2011 version did not last as long, so there is no loss. It still seems a marvel to me, distinct, versatile and for personal enjoyment; I hope it continues to delight us, even if only the name and the beautiful bottle remain of the “Original”.
Honestly, I don’t know where to start with this review, more cathartic than experiential, between DH and me, or Dior and me. A few days ago I was blocked on Instagram by the Latinoamerican Ambassador Brand, the unsavoury Pablo Schenfeld, precisely because of the reformulations (historical and almost always for the worse) of this brand, once prestigious. He emphatically denies it (according to him, perfumers soar over the fields of Grasse) and maintains that the brand changes because the public EVOLVES (those of us loyal for decades would be the UN-evolved side). He could cite thousands of cases where they destroyed creations with flankers (Poisons, DHs, Miss Dior, Addicts…). I asked him why he was profiting from the DH line and this 2020 hybrid without iris, and now they are back with the DH Original (again with iris!). Does the public decide the direction? His answer: DOES NOT KNOW / DOES NOT ANSWER / BLOCK. The “original” formula has more than those three notes. The bottle is not like the 2020 one, but like the 2005 or 2011, which was no longer a silver tube but black. Does the chaos make sense? What does Dior intend? If it is to surprise with new bottled Frankenstein monsters, the metrics work perfectly. Humble opinion: the only thing achieved is a captive public dependent on portals or YouTubers to keep buying at their own risk. Not even the consultants know where they are, scripted for absurd answers worthy of the Ambassador: THE COMPANY EVOLVES, THE CLIENTS EVOLVE (but we keep profiting with the same bottles and names). My message: more than ever, research and try testers before buying, because more than ever you can end up with the disappointment of your life.
Original or not, it is the perfume that keeps alive the essence of the origin of one of the best designer collections, transcending in quality and innovation, with nothing to envy from many niche brands. I had the fortune of trying the 2011 version for years before the generic 2020 version usurped its space, which has nothing to do with it. I bought this renamed “Original” and rest assured, it is essentially the same. I note that it feels simpler, more watery, fitting a simplification of notes. Clearly it lost the leather, the biggest difference, but it maintains the controversial and special iris that dominates the composition, velvety and softening over time. It is much fresher (not citrusy or aquatic, watch out) than the Intense and Parfum, without the initial citrus touch, rather spicy and spiced by the cardamom which disappears leaving the iris as the protagonist. When the iris softens, a non-earthy nuance is perceived that gives cleanliness, blending with the final vetiver, nothing shrill and secondary. The olfactory perception is the same as the 2011 in its latest formulations; for non-frequent users it seems the same, but in the details lies the difference; it loses depth and complexity, it is no longer multi-layered, more flat and linear. Despite this, it is worth it; longevity and projection similar to the latest shipments of 2011, moderate performance but acceptable duration. In its final moments, the 2011 was far from old formulations, so there is no loss. It still seems to me a marvel, a different perfume, versatile and for personal enjoyment, let’s hope it continues for many years, although of “Original” only the name and the beautiful bottle will remain.
Does anyone know if this will be marketed in Spain? As far as I can see, it’s only available on French websites for now, although the official site does sell it here, albeit at a high price. I have the Intense version and I’m absolutely fascinated by it. I’m not sure if owning the Original is redundant or if it’s better as a complementary scent.
Does anyone know if it will be marketed in Spain? As far as I can see, only French websites, although on the official site they do sell it here (at a high price). I have the Intense and I am fascinated by it. I don’t know if owning the original is redundant or if it is complementary.
Dior Homme was born in 2005, and I believe that is the original. I thought Demachy had left and Kurkdjian was stepping in. In fact, I was at that launch, that year and hour of the English cut. There is a lot of commercialism and little Maison luxury. Let’s hope the new nose creates something interesting, away from the hyper-chemical hype of the laboratory and that the relentless flankers of this gentleman cease. Little creativity, living off comfortable rents. I haven’t bought Dior for years, except for Eau Sauvage, but not even that, because Demachy ruined it before leaving. Wish them well and hope the Maison gets a grip.
Dior Homme, rebranded as “original”, is a truly “niche” perfume, just like the Intense or the Parfum. For their exclusivity and quality, they have rewritten the history of perfumery. You must like iris with this trilogy; the Dior iris is elegant and perhaps evokes feminine cosmetics, but with a masterful twist that makes it one of the best masculine fragrances. The “original” is more versatile, the only one that could be a signature scent of genuine luxury, for a trained nose and not for the masses. Usable all year round, limit sprays in summer. Six hours on skin, longer on clothes. Bright opening with fleeting citrus giving way to iris and lavender, which adds cleanliness and freshness. A slight sweetness in the dry-down, nothing gourmand, without the sweetness of the Intense, making it more acceptable. Suitable for day and night, all weather except extreme heat. Good for formal or semi-formal situations, even daily wear with an elegant and seductive touch. Suitable for any age from 25 years onwards. An absolute masterpiece.
A talcum-iris, powdery, with very subtle green and citrus nuances (I assume from the vetiver, though one shouldn’t trust these briefs too much). Once it settles on the skin, a chocolatey note emerges, not too sweet, gourmand without being so. It is not as “makeup-like” as others say, but it lacks that “radiant” texture of the Dior Homme Intense. Ideal for mild or cold days, discreet for the office, offering elegance and subtlety that is hard to find nowadays when everyone seeks projection and longevity at all costs.
An exquisite fragrance, a pity regarding its performance; it lasts a mere breath and has no sillage.
An exquisite fragrance, a pity for its performance: it lasts a mere breath and leaves no trail.
I was really looking forward to this and have just received it. Batch 3GuY, manufactured in July 2023, seven months and seven days ago. I verified that it is the latest reformulation of DIOR HOMME ORIGINAL, purchased on a French website. It is worth it; it reminds me greatly of the first version, I would say it lies somewhere between the 2005 and the 2007 Cologne. In detail, it is more powdery, less earthy but still dusty and velvety, with an opening in the style of the Cologne. I love it, aside from the prejudice of the lipstick scent, although with this reformulation they have blended it very well with cardamom and vetiver, giving it a masculine touch. They say it does not last or project, but for me it lasts and delivers bursts of that delicious aroma whenever it feels like it. It is ideal for spring and summer, as it is not an INTENSE in terms of longevity or projection; it is more like an Eau de Toilette.
Is it worth it in 2024, or has it already been reformulated?
I had been longing for this one and now I finally have it. Batch 3GuY, made in July 2023, worn for 7 months and 7 days. I can confirm it is indeed the last reformulation of the original Dior Homme. I picked it up on a French website. It is worth it; it bears a striking resemblance to the 2005 version, sitting somewhere between the DH 2005 and the 2007 Cologne. It is dustier, less earthy but powdery and velvety, with an opening reminiscent of the Cologne. I absolutely love it; my prejudice about the lipstick scent is gone. Now they blend it well with cardamom and vetiver, giving it more masculinity. They say it doesn’t last or project, but for me, it does and throws out bursts of that delicious aroma whenever it feels like it. Ideal for spring and summer; it is not an INTENSE in terms of longevity or projection, more like an Eau de Toilette.
@Eucalyptus, if you could snag the 2011 version with its original batch for those extra 40 euros, do you think it would be worth it? Best regards.
@JVUANMA it depends on the type of user one is. If one is a collector and liked it more than the current one, I think it is a perfume that, if well preserved, should be kept, but I do not think any perfume deserves paying an extra price that feeds the second-hand market. It is true that they have their differences and this new original is less dense and the cacao part hardly predominates at all, but it fulfils the same function and the DNA is recognisable, being moreover available for sale to whoever wants it. If one has not tried either of the two versions, it is not worth the extra outlay for something one does not know if one will like more or less than what is currently sold as ‘Original’. I personally would not do it as I consider myself a normal perfume user, but I understand it to be a possibility for whoever has the pleasure of storing discontinued perfumes in a collection and has great appreciation for a specific one, in this case Dior Homme.
@Raiagar I thank you very much for the information. Yesterday, before reading your comment, I decided to buy the 2011 version because I had heard that the ‘original’ version had a simpler scent and very low performance. I found the 2011 version new, pristine and at a good price, so I went for it. I am glad to know that the ‘original’ version has nothing to envy the 2011 one, so when mine runs out, I know I can buy the new version. Best regards.
@JVUANMA. I apologise for intruding but I have both and I tell you to go for the one you can buy at Dior. Meaning this one, it is perfect and has nothing to envy the vintage version.
@Eucalipto Many thanks for your reply. I am a normal perfume user. I have smelled the final breaths of the 2011 version. In fact, I have a 10ml sample and I like the scent a lot; the performance on me is acceptable, but I had the doubt of whether there would be considerable differences, in terms of scent and longevity, to justify the extra price or buying the ‘original’, which, as I have read, maintains the same DNA, but is a bit lighter, fresher and therefore more versatile, which I do not dislike.
A MYSTERIOUS IRIS. I love the whole Dior Homme line, but I have only dared to buy, in addition to the fresh Cologne, this ‘Original’ version for personal use, although occasionally, because I do not always feel comfortable with it. This iris has a more cosmetic air, which some might associate with a feminine touch, but beware: on male skin it is impressive. Its scent evokes something known, reliable and charming, but wrapped in earthy notes that create a halo of mystery and silkiness. The only drawback is that it is an eau de toilette and, in certain situations, it can fall short. However, to enjoy in small intimate moments, it functions as an extraordinary personal bubble. This ‘Original’ version emerged as a response to the criticism following the reformulation of the original Dior Homme, which left fans confused by keeping the name but changing the essence. Dior rectified by launching this fragrance with the surname ‘Original’, very faithful to the initial formula (although, of course, it can vary slightly due to legal or ingredient changes). It is undoubtedly the most niche option in the line. At the time it was revolutionary for men’s perfumery and, today, it remains a charming and unique scent. A fragrance for those who dare to maintain elegance when the world asks for something else. Although it remains available in France (for example at Sephora Champs-Élysées), its distribution in Spain and other countries is limited, although it can be bought easily online on the official Dior website.
For the many users who for years have used the many and different versions of Dior Homme, I now feel great sadness and even feel deceived by the disappearance of the iris note in all versions, whether Dior Homme, Dior Homme Eau for Men, etc. That talc-like, masculinised iris note, almost on the edge, with that scent reminiscent of makeup powder, was simply removed without any notice and they continued selling the same perfume without changing the bottle or the name. They kept selling the same bottle, but they changed the ingredients. This warrants a huge lawsuit; if we think seriously, it is like buying your usual remedy at the same high price, only to find out they removed part of the formula; or buying a Mercedes only to discover it does not come with leather seats anymore but with denim seats and a 2.0 engine replaced by a 1000cc engine made in China. I am not sure exactly which year this happened, but one goes to buy their usual perfume and finds they have been cheated, or the perfume has been changed and once opened you cannot return it. And if the change was for the last time to make it better, it was actually for the worse; it passed to smell generic, with mediocre longevity and sillage. So if you read this, always test in store or ask if it has been reformulated, otherwise you will find surprises and bad moments. Most likely, the cost of the iris raw material is so expensive as the rhizome is left to dry and ferment for 3 years and then turned into powder, the Iris Pallida variety which can cost more than €100,000 per kilogram. The yield of the crushed rhizomes represents 0.2-0.4% as data.
The best designer perfume of the current era and of everything from this century in terms of quality, singularity and versatility. BUT it lasts a mere breath (on my skin at least). It is very close to the Dior Homme EDT from 2011, being slightly more citrusy in this version. Without cacao notes, the iris there is more ‘creamy’ and this one is fresher. I stick with the 2011 version.
I rarely speak of this beauty, but it is truly special. A rarity here, it is the 2021 version crafted by François Demachy, reorchestrating his 2011 reinterpretation of the 2005 classic by Olivier Polge. Confused? Yes, well known that Dior buried it under names. The only listed notes are Tuscan iris, Guatemalan cardamom, and Haitian vetiver. The European flower, Mesoamerican spice, and Caribbean root form the structure, though there is more: the bright opening features lavender, bergamot, and sage; the sumptuous heart holds roasted cacao, without evoking anything edible (definitely not gourmand); and the dry-down is sensual, earthy, and ambered, achieved with patchouli, leather, and an ethereal vetiver. I have nothing like it in my collection. I can imagine how disruptive it was in 2005 when men’s fragrances were heading in another direction. It is sexy and soft, in a style that defies gender. Today, we take this for granted with so many cloying gourmands or spiced vanillas amidst a sea of amber bombs and potent aroma chemicals. A good example are current popular flankers like DH Intense and DH Parfum. For me, the Original is on another level, in a different category both in composition and sensation. I love wearing it at the office, but where I enjoy it most is at formal evening events or dates. I am wearing it today because I need to be seductive at work, in a political sense, of course.
I almost never speak of this beauty, but it is special. A rarity on this side of the Atlantic, it is the 2021 version that Francois Demachy created from his own reorchestration of 2011 of the modern classic from 2005 created by Olivier Polge. Confused? Yes, it is well known that Dior messed up with the names of their men’s fragrances. The only notes listed are, from top to bottom: Tuscany iris, Guatemalan cardamom and Haitian vetiver. The European flower, the Mesoamerican spice and the Caribbean root definitely form the structure, although we know there are more materials. For example, the bright opening includes lavender, bergamot and sage; the sumptuous heart has roasted cacao, without evoking anything edible (this definitely is not a gourmand); and the dry down is sensual, earthy and with an amber touch, achieved with patchouli and leather, plus an ethereal vetiver. I have nothing remotely similar to this perfume in my collection. I can imagine how disruptive it was in 2005, when men’s fragrances were heading in another direction. It is sexy and soft, in a style that challenges genres. Of course, nowadays we take this for granted, with so many cloying gourmands or spiced vanillas trying to stand out amidst a sea of woody amber bombs and other potent aroma chemicals. A good example are the most popular flankers from Dior (in their current formulations): DH Intense and DH Parfum. For me, the Original is on another level, in a completely different category, both in composition and sensation. I love wearing it on office days, but where I enjoy it most is at formal evening events or dates with my partner. I am wearing it today because I need to be seductive at work… in a political sense, of course.
This version, which they try to sell only in France, tastes somewhat insipid compared to the Olivier Polge one. Both on application and as it develops, the Olivier Polge version is superior, although it is very hard to find as it has been discontinued; if you have it, it is pleasant, subtle and elegant, definitely not beast mode. Francois Demachy has many successes but his interpretation of Dior Homme Original is not one of them; it is rather insipid. The DH2020 version is an interpretation of the 2005 one, much more citrusy and woody but without iris; it is a superconcentrated Dior Homme Sport and can be more pleasant for everyone. Ranking from least to most attractive: Dior Homme Original, Dior Homme Sport (citrusy and slightly woody), Dior Homme 2020 (very citrusy and fresh, woody), Dior Homme Intense (there he truly had a genius touch with iris, lavender and vanilla), and Dior Homme Parfum 2014 (it is one of the best in the world, with oud, vanilla, sandalwood and leather).
I bought the late 2025 batch and who says it smells different from the Olivier Polge version? Honestly, either they haven’t tested it or they aren’t here. To my nose, they are identical. In fact, I have a DH Intense from 2018 and it smells very similar to this original. In my opinion, this is now the best in the Homme line. It is true that it is hard to find in Spain, but I managed to get it online from a French perfumerie for €94 for a 100ml bottle and I could not be happier. If you loved the old formulations of DH Intense or the first EDT, you will not regret getting a bottle of this. It is a true marvel.