Skip to content

Infusion d’Iris (2015) by Prada

Women 2015

Brand
Prada

Description

Infusion d'Iris (2015) by Prada is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2015, this olfactive composition bears the signature of perfumer Daniela Andrier.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 13%
  • Spring 37%
  • Summer 29%
  • Autumn 21%
  • Day 78%
  • Night 22%

Key notes

Community

2,827 votes

  • Positive 82%
  • Negative 9.3%
  • Neutral 8.3%
positive reviews 2.8 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

7,033 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

3,018 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,436 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Infusion d’Iris (2015)

Main accord iris Year 2015 Gender Women Perfumer Daniela Andrier

Infusion d’Iris (2015) by Prada is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2015, this olfactive composition bears the signature of perfumer Daniela Andrier.

Flowers Woods and mosses Resins and balsams

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

1,187 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,303 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

916 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

774 votes

Community reviews

34 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Perfumoon

    Another Prada gem, truly unisex. It smells clean, with a violet-tinged iris reminiscent of fine soap. Cedar and benzoin base: be careful, as it can trigger headaches in some, so don’t over-spray. It’s not meant to draw attention, but rather to be worn like a second skin. It could be your signature scent, though in summer I prefer other options. High-end, almost niche; the 100ml bottle is available online for €90.

    Reply
  2. Casablanca77

    The 2015 Infusion d’Iris has far less incense than the 2007 version; at times it’s barely noticeable, almost non-existent. Nevertheless, I use it with great pleasure as it’s one of the few iris scents I can stand; it’s an all-rounder for any season. It never offends, possessing a subtle elegance and a good vibe without seeking attention. It’s like a Chanel 1957 or a MFK 724: it adds stature without overwhelming anyone. A clean, neat sensation. Bathing in this fills you with serenity and patience. It’s the brand’s jewel, though I’d love to see them bring back that Somali incense with more joy. It was divine to notice an incense presence that wasn’t heavy, amidst this absolute cleanliness of this Prada marvel.

    Reply
  3. I agree with those who said it smells like baby wipes; it’s the most innocent, fragile, and soft scent I know in perfumery.

    Reply
  4. efímeratempestad

    I was really keen to try this fragrance and what a letdown; to me, it smells like Dodot baby wipes.

    Reply
  5. I tried Infusion d’Iris over several days, and it was like experiencing an olfactory journey that changes depending on the moment. It doesn’t shout, it doesn’t ask for attention; it whispers with elegance. It opens with mandarin and orange blossom, which pass quickly. Unlike other citrus notes, there’s no explosion here, but rather a delicate transition to galbanum, bitter yet refined. Then comes the iris, the protagonist. Its powdery and clean facet reminds me of expensive but modern talc. It’s a simple elegance that doesn’t look simple. I never managed to isolate the incense; if it was there, it was just a touch of depth. What I did notice was the benzoin and vetiver base, warm, like wrapping yourself in a light scarf at the end of the day, although I expected more projection. It lingers on the skin for hours but doesn’t leave a strong trail. It’s meant to be enjoyed in silence. Compared to Chanel No. 19, this is kinder and less green, as if it whispers where Chanel speaks. It could have an affinity with Acqua di Parma’s Iris Nobile, but this is less floral and more minimalist. In the reformulations, I tried a recent one and understand why many lament the loss of potency. The structure remains beautiful, but the performance has dropped significantly. If you’re looking for something elegant and ethereal to feel impeccable without being the centre of attention, it remains enchanting. In the end, it’s like a freshly ironed white shirt: always appropriate, always elegant, but perhaps too contained to want to leave a mark.

    Reply
  6. efímeratempestad

    I was eager to try it, and what a disappointment; to me, it smells like Dodot wipes.

    Reply
  7. kath2802

    I’ve never commented on this fragrance before; it’s one of my favourites. Bottled versatility. Iris is one of my favourite notes, and this is so fresh, soft, comforting, and well-blended; I don’t know the previous formula, but I love it. On me, it has good longevity, staying in a very pleasant personal bubble. One word: pleasant. (We’re starting a project: get a back-up so they don’t discontinue it and I’m left without it). ❤️

    Reply
  8. Mr. Baskerville

    The previous review says it all and does it well, and personally, I love it. Infusion D’Iris has the virtue of providing well-being through that sense of cleanliness. To my taste, it’s a bit more feminine and very close to the 2007 version. The sensation is like a lady who took a bath in a tub with scented soap; the effluvia remain subtly but persistently on the clean skin. I like it a lot for relaxed, calm, and intimate moments; a delight. It has a very well-crafted iris, preceded by a soft and recognisable citrus opening, with a woody base that supports it with class. It has that powdery aspect of the main note, but I find it less intense than the 2007 version. As I said, it doesn’t project much, which isn’t its aim, nor does it fade quickly; it’s true that one would wish it lasted longer, but it insists that it’s not designed for that. It’s a pity it was (or is) a limited edition; unless by luck or friendship, it will be difficult to test or buy. I don’t know the price. Anyway, the old version is still available, and although it has more complexity due to a green touch and a present incense, it’s excellent. It’s a pity I can’t test the rest of the collection.

    Reply
  9. Do you want to smell good? Blindly. Whether you’re a man, a woman, elle, ella, illi, dog, cat, giraffe, whatever you are.

    Reply
  10. FecoParfums

    Do you want to smell good? Blindly. Whether you’re a man, a woman, elle, ella, illi, a dog, a cat, a giraffe or whatever.

    Reply
  11. I’ll mention in passing that this reformulation devalues the result, with very poor performance and projection. Nevertheless, in terms of aroma, it remains a masterpiece. Danielle Andrier Roche has established herself as the best at using iris, masterfully musky-ing it to give it that clean, soapy air. It’s unique, and she created delicious flankers like Infusion d’Homme or Infusion d’Iris Cedre. A niche, white, clean, elegant scent, with a subtlety that makes it portable in summer. On the other hand, it disappears in the cold. For short distances, but it leaves an olfactory mark. Perfect for hospitals or the office, where it doesn’t invade or saturate, but acts as an immaculate second skin. Absolutely unisex; the composition ensures it doesn’t lean towards the feminine. A must-have in any collection.

    Reply
  12. My old bottle has run out, I’ve opened the new one, and I’m disappointed; this reformulation lets me down.

    Reply
  13. One of the top iris scents on the market. It opens clean, elegant and sparkly, but dries down to a creamy, dense scent with a resinous woody base that I absolutely adore. It’s super versatile and unisex, though I’d say it leans more towards women. There’s no age or occasion it can’t handle. The downside is that on my skin it has no projection and lasts no more than four hours; if it performed better, I’d buy it without a second thought.

    Reply
  14. Marce Cib71

    Its fresh, clean scent gives confidence for hot days. I’m from a place where temperatures reach 40 degrees with 100% humidity, and this scent does me a favour by making me feel freshly bathed. I’d describe it as floral, fresh and green. Even in those climatic conditions, it lasts.

    Reply
  15. Dama Incognita

    A soft, talc-like fragrance, ideal for any occasion. The iris and cedar are very prominent; the mandarin (a little acidic) only appears at the beginning and disappears over time. On my skin it lasts very little and its trail is weak. I bought it in a set with shower gel and body cream, and layering the scent helps it to last longer.

    Reply
  16. I’m furious with this perfume: it smells incredible but its performance is laughable. It’s an overwhelming amount of iris, tender and cosy, more feminine in my opinion, though it doesn’t look bad on a man either. When I was young I was given a sample and fell in love with the baby powder scent; I felt tender and pretty and dreamed of owning it. Recently I was given another and thought ‘this is it!’. I was so happy to have found it… until I saw it lasted only two hours and sat right on the skin after thirty minutes. I don’t have the best skin for fragrances, but I moisturise well and they usually last acceptably, so obviously they have reformulated this wonderful perfume. It smells the same, but lasts and projects much less. What a shame, because with how expensive it is, no matter how much I love it, I don’t want to spend 100 euros to be scented for less than two hours.

    Reply
  17. Caroline Morá

    I’m not sure which version I have, I only know it says 2014 on the box…🤨 I’ve really liked it; it’s super elegant, sober, fresh and clean. The opening is fascinating, an exquisite citrus, but it changes quickly, sitting right on the skin and becoming very talc-like. What surprises me is that after a couple of hours it feels more intense; the iris is very beautiful and singular. Six hours have passed and I can still smell it on my skin and clothes, though subtly, with little trail, but the cedar, frankincense and iris remain… With it, the phrase ‘less is more’ comes to mind. I feel it’s unisex. On my husband it disappeared after two hours…😮. How good, as it will be just for me, hehe.

    Reply
  18. A refined and lovely scent, reminiscent of dried flowers, letters tied with ribbons and baby powder. It evokes nostalgia, romance and cleanliness. I imagine a woman from a Henry James novel or a melancholic student in Paris. At first, I thought it was too vintage for me, but now I’m convinced. It’s perceptible, elegant and original. It gets better with time, which is rare.

    Reply
  19. A very fine and beautiful scent. It reminds me of dried flowers, stacked letters tied with a ribbon, and toilet powder. The feeling it evokes is nostalgia, but also romance and cleanliness. I imagine a woman from Henry James novels, an elegant spinster aunt, or a very melancholic young girl. I picture myself in a room in Paris watching Picasso paint Olga, or a student in her attic wearing a nightdress with lace trim and frills. At first, when I put it on, I thought it didn’t represent me. Too much vintage inclination. But today I thought, surely not? It’s perceptible, but not cloying. I find it elegant and original without being strident. It gains with memory and hours, and that’s rare.

    Reply
  20. fragranceshot

    It leans more towards the feminine, but I love it anyway. It smells clean and elegant. It’s true that Prada perfumes can be criticised for many things, especially in recent times, but I don’t know how they do it; almost all of them have that touch of elegance. I like the 2007 version much more, but well, this is what there is now. The scent won’t disappoint you; longevity and trail, that’s another matter…

    Reply
  21. Amarilisbelladona

    Change of opinion: I find it boring, it doesn’t last at all, and it has nothing to do with the perfume it used to be. It’s a con, and with the price it has, the drop in quality is a disservice to the brand. It’s excessively soft and short-lived; after two hours it has disappeared completely, it doesn’t scent clothes, it just has no strength, it doesn’t hold. For what it costs, it’s not worth it; I’m extremely disappointed.

    Reply
  22. vladlena 1994

    Much more of a perfume for women than for men. Clean scent and very relaxing. To use during the day and for everyday wear. It doesn’t overwhelm at all. Very elegant and sophisticated.

    Reply
  23. An ode to cleanliness and tidiness. Truly, what a beautiful scent; I thought it would be much more woody and leaning towards masculine, but how wrong I was. It’s a very, very soft but lasting fragrance. I associate it with the smell of newborn babies, very soft. It’s a scent anyone can wear; I’d even put it on my children.

    Reply
  24. Amarilisbelladona

    Infusion d’Iris launched in 2007 as a limited edition, a beautiful fragrance that was discontinued and reappeared in 2015 with notes different from the original 2007 version, which featured African orange blossom, neroli, orange and mandarin; a heart of iris, galbanum and juniper; and a base of incense, Virginia cedar, benzoin and vetiver. I won’t go into detail as there are already good reviews on its page, but I want to clarify that the 2007 version that made it famous is now out of production and no longer sold, and it was very different from the 2015 one: much more intense, rich and with better longevity. That doesn’t mean this version is bad; it’s subjective and everyone has their own tastes, but certainly it is not the same perfume.

    Reply
  25. Amarilisbelladona

    Infusion d’Iris launched in 2007 as a limited edition, a beautiful scent that was discontinued and relaunched in 2015 with notes different from the original 2007 version. The 2007 release featured a top of African orange blossom, neroli, orange and mandarin; a heart of iris, galbanum and juniper; and a base of incense, Virginia cedar, benzoin and vetiver. I won’t go into detail as there are already good reviews on its page, but I want to clarify that the 2007 version which made it famous has been discontinued and is no longer available, being very different from the 2015 one: it was more intense, richer and lasted longer. That doesn’t mean this version is bad, it’s very subjective and everyone has their own tastes, but it’s certainly not the same perfume.

    Reply
  26. Here, take the Prada infusions! They are refreshing waters but last with woods. In my opinion, the Prada ones are better resolved than the Guerlain Aquas Allegories. These refresh, evolve and leave a mark. The iris here has strength and firmness, not its tender and coquettish facet, accompanied by a fine, elegant and strong wood. That wood gives it the ‘masculinity’ I like in originally feminine perfumes. It’s unisex in reality: a strong, resilient iris that doesn’t get damaged by the rain.

    Reply
  27. Take the Infusions de Prada already! They are refreshing waters that linger with woody notes. In my opinion, Prada’s are better resolved than Guerlain’s L’Homme Idéal or the Aquas Allegories. They refresh, evolve and leave a mark. The iris here is found in its tenderest and coquettish facet, but here it has strength and firmness accompanied by a fine, elegant and strong wood. That wood gives it that ‘masculinity’ I so love in originally feminine perfumes; they are unisex in reality. A strong, resilient iris that doesn’t get damaged by the rain.

    Reply
  28. I am allergic to perfumes; they used to give me dizziness and headaches. I was looking for something light, like soap or talcum powder, and after three days of testing it, I absolutely loved it. It’s not overpowering; it smells of tenderness, elegance and cleanliness. I feel it’s unisex, but with a more feminine touch.

    Reply
  29. I am someone who has never been able to wear perfumes because I couldn’t tolerate them; they caused me discomfort, headaches and dizziness. Seeing reviews of light, soap or talc-like fragrances, I came across this one which took me three days to appreciate, but which I truly love. It is not invasive at all and evokes tenderness, elegance and cleanliness. I perceive it as unisex, leaning towards feminine.

    Reply
  30. I love it; it is one of my favourite scents. Clean, talc-like. I like it all year round. For me, it is the best with iris; Prada has nailed it with him.

    Reply