Men
Signorina Eleganza
Acordes principales
Descripción
Signorina Eleganza by Salvatore Ferragamo is a chypre floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2014, this olfactive composition was created by perfumer Sophie Labbé. The olfactive pyramid unfolds with pear and grapefruit top notes; a floral and woody heart featuring osmanthus and almond; and a warm, sensual base of patchouli and leather.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Signorina Eleganza y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
18 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
It barely smells at all. It’s a sweet but monotonous, simplistic scent that goes completely unnoticed. It seems made for very shy little girls.
It’s a pleasant and uncommon fragrance with a scent that doesn’t stand out because it feels like a blend of familiar smells. It’s delicate, has poor projection, and gives an impression of innocence. I see it well for girls aged 15 to 25 for everyday wear or informal situations, without needing to impress but with a touch of elegance. The osmanthus really stands out.
They sent me a sample for buying two, and although it has that leather note and a herbal scent I think is osmanthus, it just doesn’t suit me. It’s not a bad perfume, but I definitely wouldn’t buy it.
Among the perfumes I’ve tried recently, this is one of the ones I’ve liked the most. The combination of osmanthus, pear, and leather with a hint of almond is superb and well-balanced. It’s feminine, elegant, delicate… I love it! I want it.
Among those I’ve tried, this is one of the ones I’ve liked the most. The blend of osmanthus, pear, leather, and a hint of almond is superb and well-balanced. It’s feminine, elegant, and delicate… I love it! I want it <3
It’s a very feminine fragrance, as the name suggests: elegant, soft, and extremely subtle. It combines perfectly with a shy and delicate young lady.
It’s a very feminine fragrance, as the name says, elegant and soft… Very subtle. It combines perfectly with a young, shy, and delicate lady.
March 2017: a lovely discovery, this Signorina Eleganza by Ferragamo. I already knew the original, but this flanker interests me more. It’s a floral chypre and, like many modern chypres with both floral and fruity notes, it puts a lot of emphasis on patchouli, which is why it’s not surprising to compare it with Coco Mademoiselle, Miss Dior, or others. I agree. It starts fruity, with pear dominating and grapefruit to a lesser extent. A sparkling, fresh, and juicy opening that gives way to a warmer, sweeter, and creamier heart of almond, which is what I detect most, alongside osmanthus that continues the fruity theme. At this point, the blend of almond with the patchouli and leather base reminded me very much of Habit Rouge L’Eau (which I own): a rich, aromatic, and slightly acidic dual blend, sitting somewhere between feminine and masculine. It’s suitable for all seasons and very versatile, despite its ‘Eleganza’ title. It works best in cool weather, in the afternoon or evening. It has medium longevity and a soft but noticeable sillage. Although it’s not always mentioned, I found it very unisex, especially as it dries down. I like it.
It’s a beautiful perfume I loved from the moment I smelled it, but I’m disappointed by its lack of projection and longevity. What a pity, as it is a wonderful scent—very restrained and elegant. I hope Zara makes a dupe that lasts a bit longer. I find the aroma delicious, but at £2,000, it’s not worth the price given how short-lived it is.
I’ve never had a fragrance praised so highly, yet I wouldn’t buy it again simply because I prefer variety. Still, it was one of the best I’ve ever worn. Highly recommended!
Signorina Eleganza is sweet, feminine, tender, and delicate. It has poor projection but good longevity. It goes well for almost any season in casual situations, although in very hot weather I prefer something fresher. It’s ideal for enclosed offices because it doesn’t bother anyone. I had a sample I didn’t use because I didn’t like the pear, but after trying it, I loved it; to my nose, the pear doesn’t stand out much, it just adds sweetness. It seems to me a very well-blended set of notes. It reminds me of Chloe by Chloe for its creaminess, although it doesn’t smell the same nor like roses. It has nothing to do with Coco Mademoiselle, which smells of marked and fresh patchouli; here, that intense and earthy patchouli is barely noticeable.
Signorina Eleganza is sweet, feminine, tender, and delicate. It has poor projection but good longevity. It works well almost all year round in casual settings; I’d just avoid it in high heat as I prefer something fresher. Ideal for enclosed offices where it won’t bother anyone. I had a sample I didn’t use because I generally dislike the pear note, but upon trying it, I liked it: to my nose, it doesn’t stand out much, merely adding sweetness. It seems like a well-blended combination of notes. It reminds me of Chloe by Chloe due to its creaminess. It doesn’t smell exactly like roses, but that creamy sensation makes me think of it. I don’t feel it resembles Coco Mademoiselle at all; those have a very marked patchouli and a fresh or woody feel. In Signorina Eleganza, that intense, earthy patchouli is barely noticeable.
I just received a tester and my goodness: is it a copy of Armani Sì? Truly. The top notes seemed identical to me. I took out my Armani bottle (which I no longer used) to compare. At first, those strong floral notes didn’t smell like bergamot or pear to me, but rather synthetic, cloying freesia. Then, in the heart, it begins to develop its own character. It lacks that distinct ambroxan found in Sì, leaving only calm floral notes that lose their potency within minutes. Afterwards, a very monotonous floral scent: cheap, synthetic patchouli. As for skin notes? None. According to Fragrantica, it was released a year after the Armani, so it seems like a rushed, soulless attempt. A perfume without personality or sparkle. I wouldn’t buy it even at 30% off. A disappointment.
I just received a tester and goodness me, the moment I smelled it I thought: a copy of Armani Sì? Really? The top notes seemed identical to me. I took out my Armani bottle, which I wasn’t using, and compared them. Right away, those strong floral notes. It doesn’t smell of grapefruit or pear to me, but rather synthetic and cloying freesia. Once it reaches the heart, it starts to have its own character, different from Armani. It doesn’t have that marked ambroxan, and I only perceive calmer floral notes that lose power in minutes. Then comes a very monotonous floral scent: cheap and synthetic patchouli. Skin? Nothing of skin or remotely. According to Fragrantica, it came out a year after Armani, so I can only say they made a very ugly attempt, rushed, without love and without soul. A perfume without personality, without that spark that makes you fall in love. Nothing. I wouldn’t buy it even with a 70% discount. A total disappointment.
I bought it online thinking it was Signorina, only to find it was Eleganza. It doesn’t disgust me, but I only use it occasionally because it feels teenage to me, something I left behind decades ago. It’s a simple, feminine scent that I find a bit wearying; it would never be my personal perfume.
What a delight! The name suits it perfectly. I already own the original and the mysterious version, and this one feels elegant; the patchouli and leather give it class. It’s very similar to Coco Mademoiselle, with good projection and longevity. I really liked it: it’s more long-lasting and has more presence than the other versions, even the original, which feels sweeter, softer, and a bit childish. This one is more mature.
What a delight! The name definitely suits it. I have the original and the mysterious version, and this one seems elegant to me; the patchouli and leather give it that touch. If it is very similar to Coco Mademoiselle, the projection and longevity are good. I liked it quite a bit because it’s more enduring and has more presence than the other versions, even the original, which to me seems sweeter, tender, and childish. This one is more mature.
It’s the most polished and fresh version of Signorina EDP. I adore both: here, the leather and patchouli add maturity, yet it still sounds youthful, much like Miss Dior. The longevity is top-notch: it lasts about seven hours on the skin and several days on clothes.