Men
Uomo Trussardi 2011
Acordes principales
Descripción
Uomo Trussardi 2011 by Trussardi is an aromatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2011, the nose behind this composition is Aurélien Guichard. The top notes reveal bergamot, nutmeg, Amalfi lemon and galbanum; the heart unfolds violet, geranium and statice; while the base notes settle on leather, oakmoss and patchouli.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Uomo Trussardi 2011 y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
More than a reformulation, I believe it’s a flanker of the original Uomo from 1983 (they even used a different nose). If we compare them, the 1983 version had 20 notes and this one only 10, but those 10 are enough to delight us and take us to the clouds. It’s a masculine fragrance, fresh (almost like a Uomo Sport), elegant, and above all delicious. I would say it’s very current. It joins the select group of elegant, fresh, masculine, timeless, and colourful perfumes like Chanel Bleu. You must have it!
Another example of deceiving the consumer with a cat for a hare. Calling this Trussardi Uomo is a serious cultural outrage; they can’t discontinue the good one just to sell the bad one. It’s almost a crime, and it’s our fault as consumers for never protesting seriously.
What a beast of a fragrance! At first, it smells like Polo Blue Sport—super sporty and fresh—and then it brings back memories of Old Spice Fresh from when I used to shave. They share those two base notes: oakmoss and patchouli, plus citrus notes like lemon, bergamot, and orange. That brought my childhood back to life; it’s a pleasure to smell on my skin and reapply. It puts me in a good mood and I absolutely love it. Ideal for summer, I’d recommend it. Regarding what Juancar7777 said, I disagree: if they changed the name to Trussardi Uomo 2011, it doesn’t have to be the same as the 1983 version. If they change the name, they can change the notes. This perfume is adorable; sometimes reading negative comments when the perfume isn’t even that is annoying. Give it a try and you’ll see it’s worth it; you’ll remember me.
If I criticise some fragrances it’s because I don’t like them. I think Trussardi Uomo isn’t a bad perfume, nor does it disappear to skin scent in less than an hour, nor is it pure water as someone else said. I simply came to comment what I thought, so other people don’t just read negative comments and miss the good ones about this fragrance. Greetings and good luck!
Of course, this fragrance has nothing to do with the vintage. I formed my opinion on this perfume relaunched to the market after 18 years, where its smell changes absolutely compared to the original version.
I quite like it. It’s a clean, rich, and very linear scent that has great longevity on my skin. I don’t understand those who desperately seek a trail that knocks people over or can be smelled from the other side of the street. This perfume is enjoyed at medium-to-close range and is one of those perfumes.
Right, this is the usual topic. Everyone thinks what they want. Some love it, others find it disgusting. Some smell it good, others find it terrible. Juancar, if for you it’s a disaster and a bad reformulation, you have every right to opine thus (I think so). Everyone perceives differently and has distinct experiences with perfumes. ‘She saw it…’ Juancar, I don’t think the Italian brand Trussardi has anything to do with the making of this perfume (nor any other), just as Dior has nothing to do now with its perfumes (they are made by LVMH) and so all designer brands that have sold their names to cosmetic multinationals like LVMH, L’Oreal, P&G, etc. By the way, I strongly agree with Juancar’s first comment, the one at the very bottom.
I like it quite a bit. It’s a clean, rich, and very linear scent, and on my skin it has great longevity. I also don’t quite understand the forum users who desperately seek a trail that knocks people down or have people smell you from the other side of the street when you’re walking down the road. Perfume is also enjoyed at medium-short distance, and this is one of those perfumes.
First, the notes on Fragrantica are the same as the sample, just with small changes in the names. The opening is fresh with Italian lemon, bergamot, soft nutmeg, and something I think is galbanum. At four hours, the citrus touch remains but is reinforced with statice and some geranium. The statice gives it a metallic air and a sharp, more synthetic note is felt, which could be that. At nine hours, the violet enters and what with effort seems to be leather; however, this stage confuses me a bit. At twelve, the ending is similar, with touches of violet and leather. I didn’t clearly feel the oakmoss nor a standout patchouli. The longevity, using the entire 1.2 ml sample, exceeded 12 hours, with a trail that starts heavy on the citrus but remains moderate. I see it for daytime and autumn use, but I don’t find it appealing: being purely aromatic, it doesn’t follow a clear path. It lacks good woods to remember, the floral part is weak, the citrus somewhat synthetic, the leather almost absent, and the ending confusing. Nothing like the 1983 Trussardi Uomo, which has another character. This is rather insipid.
Without judging whether it’s the same as the original (which I haven’t tried), this reformulated Trussardi Uomo is worth it. It’s made for the modern market but doesn’t give up personality and elegance. It starts citrusy and green, but the secret lies in its development: a blend of black leather with a metallic, salty, and synthetic note. The combination is curious and gives a neat and masculine impression. It’s not an old-school cologne, but something contemporary, fresh yet elegant, avoiding the chocolate or biscuit smell and seeking something more than the typical freshness. I’m talking about things like Bleu de Chanel or Invictus. Trussardi, for me, is better and cheaper. Its trail and longevity are moderate, a pass mark. Note: 7.5.
I tried it in the shop today and the truth is it smells very weak and doesn’t last at all. Nothing like the original formulation. I won’t be buying it.
I haven’t tried the vintage version either (although I tested it once and it was brutal), but this Trussardi Uomo seems more current for this year. It starts citrusy and herbal with a spicy touch. The heart is floral thanks to the violet, carnation, and statice, which I love in any perfume. The leather doesn’t just dominate the dry-down; it’s the main reason for the entire development; it’s a very dignified black leather worthy of the brand. The patchouli is moderate and the oakmoss gives it consistency. It’s elegant, Italian style, and offers good performance. I see it for intermediate seasons and it serves both day and night. More than aromatic, I feel it as a leather perfume on my skin. For me, the 2011 isn’t a reformulation nor a flanker; it’s a perfume with its own life that has little to do with the classic 1983. That one was a perfume and this is another, and I think each fits perfectly with its time and tastes. It’s a current elegant, very masculine, with an infinite sensuality that hypnotises as time passes. For me, it’s very special and has nothing to do with passing fads.
Bought this bottle in March and, although I’m wary of it being a different distributor (even though the box and bottle are identical), it genuinely caught me by surprise. Lately, I’ve been exploring its night side and it’s brutal: sex in a bottle. It leaves no one indifferent; it wraps around you subtly yet provocatively. Leather is the undisputed star, very noticeable in the blend. It doesn’t behave the same at lunch as it does in a pub at night (the latter is better). I don’t feel it’s overpowering and recommend it without hesitation. Total versatility, but be careful in summer if at all.
Trussardi Uomo 2011 smells great; it’s masculine and aromatic, fitting perfectly into the fougère family thanks to that blend of notes. Since I’ve never tried the original from 1983, I don’t know if it’s been reformulated, but this version has convinced me. It starts with a light citrus touch, floral notes like geranium which are very noticeable, and it even seems there’s lavender, along with spices like nutmeg. The citrus fades quickly, but soon a leathery touch emerges that doesn’t dominate but is always there. In the end, it’s a modern aromatic fern with classic touches, ideal for those who enjoy them, like me. I see it as super versatile: for the office, casual outings, or formal parties. It suits any time of year. The performance is average; it’s noticeable at first but drops to skin level after two hours and lasts about 6 or 7 hours, so it’s not one of the longest-lasting. The scent isn’t unique, but it’s very pleasant and at an accessible price compared to other options in this style.
Uomo 2011 smells great; it’s masculine and aromatic, fitting into the fougère family for me due to that blend of notes. I’ve never tried the original 1983 version, so I don’t know if it’s a complete reformulation, but I really like this one. It starts with something citrusy, then the geranium comes in, quite present, perhaps with a touch of lavender, and spices like nutmeg. The citrus is fleeting, but soon a leathery note emerges that doesn’t dominate but is always there. In the end, it’s a modern aromatic fern with classic touches, ideal for those who enjoy that style. I see it as super versatile: office, casual outings, formal parties… and for any season. The performance is average: it projects well at first, but after a few hours it drops to skin scent and lasts about 6 or 7 hours, so it’s not one of the longest-lasting. The scent isn’t unique, but it smells good and is worth it for the price.
Today I am using this marvel. I have it for years and it is spectacular. I have an unfavourable pH and I applied it about 4 hours ago and it is still firm on my skin and not close to the skin, it makes itself felt. Highly recommended. I add: 5 hours have passed since application and it just enters the phase of feeling close to the skin but it is still noticeable. Highly recommended.
This Trussardi Uomo 2011 has nothing to do with the original, as has been said. At least they had decency and put the surname 2011. But it is not a reformulation based on the original that smells similar with current tastes, nothing to do with it neither in olfactory family nor in fragrance. My evaluation is for this current fragrance, without comparing it with the classic. It is pleasant, but with little or no personality. Longevity and sillage normal, below average. Versatility I don’t see it either, it has an intrusive point. I perceive a soft but stinging citrus opening due to the nutmeg, followed by soft geranium and violet, and little more. What I feel is some unlisted ozonic or chemical aquatic note, those that give a ‘clean’ smell. If you like that type of fragrances and find them at a good price (less than 30 eur/100ml) it is a better option than Montblanc’s, but as a purchase in itself I do not consider it interesting or good, it enters the category of those that leave me indifferent. Au revoir.
After thinking about it a lot I have acquired it. It has a close resemblance to Mont Blanc Legend, but this Trussardi Uomo stands out more in scent (less synthetic) and results more pleasant. In projection, which is not a monster, it fulfils. Let’s say it is the older brother of Mont Blanc’s Legend. Although they have resemblance and go down the same path, there is a difference, they are brothers not twins. In summary, this Trussardi Uomo feels more elegant, with more class, more creamy, while Mont Blanc Legend falls into the synthetic and doesn’t reach the top. If I had to choose, I stay with Trussardi Uomo. Do I recommend its purchase? Yes, if you find it for no more than 30 dollars. Scent: Pleasant (7.5). Projection: 7.0 in the first 3 hours. Longevity: 6 to 7 hours. Max.
Fresh day and I use this fragrance which I like very much… if only it had more longevity it would perhaps be one of the most sought-after. From start to finish it feels a very Italian-style citrus together with nutmeg embracing something very subtle floral and an elegant leather like a blazer of the same material… it is not at all intrusive and lasts quite a bit close to the skin. I consider it more for closed environments and formal events… even for the office, surely many compliments will fall. I hope that in the future the sillage and projection improve, because the scent is wonderful.
After thinking about it for a long time, I bought it. It resembles Mont Blanc Legend a lot, but the Trussardi smells better (less synthetic) and is more pleasant. Its projection isn’t monstrous, but it does the job. I’d say it’s the older brother of Mont Blanc Legend; although they go down the same path and resemble each other, there are differences. They are brothers, not twins. In summary, the Trussardi feels more elegant, with more class and a creamy texture, whereas Mont Blanc Legend falls into the synthetic and doesn’t reach its full potential. If I have to choose between the two, I’d stick with the Trussardi. Would I recommend it? Yes, if you can find it for no more than $30. Scent: Pleasant (7.5), Projection: 7.0 in the first three hours, Longevity: 6 to 7 hours.
This Trussardi is the pure definition of a masculine fragrance: elegant and versatile, featuring leather, violet, and patchouli. At first, it smells strong and alcoholic, almost like an eighties vintage, but within a minute the sting subsides and gives way to floral, citrus, and sweet notes that end in a delicious, manly leather. I’ve loved it; ideal for dates or semi-formal events. Note that the longevity was weak when I tested it in summer and it disappointed me, but now, in the middle of winter (August 5th), things have changed for the better. Clearly, this Trussardi is for fresh weather. Cheers!
This Trussardi represents very well the definition of ‘men’s fragrance’. Elegant but versatile scent where leather, violets and patchouli stand out. The opening smells alcoholic and stinging, strong. Personally, it gave me a sensation of something 80s, vintage. After a minute the sting subsides and gives way to a more floral, citrusy and sweet sensation that leads to a delicious and masculine leather. I have liked it very much, its elegance makes it ideal for something intimate, dates and semi-formal to formal meetings. Curiosity: the performance was the weakest point at first and I felt disappointed, but attention, I write this on August 5th (full winter in Argentina) and things changed for the better. Obviously, the fresh climate is what goes with this Trussardi. Regards.
Perfume very similar to Mont Blanc Legend EDT; when dry, they are almost identical. Since Trussardi is a cheaper brand, it’s a good option to replace the Legend. Refined scent, woody, with a floral touch and intense. But not intense in longevity, but in components; it feels well-armed and heavy in the Italian style. It is the perfume an Italian mafioso with a hat and black or grey overcoat would have worn in the 40s-50s, at least that image it brings me. It’s for indoors, very good for the office. If you use it outside it doesn’t work, it projects nothing, but it does make itself felt in a closed environment if you get close. Good longevity, it lasts long hours but close to the skin (more than 10h). Projection scarce as I held. Nevertheless, I like it, it inspires class and respect by distancing itself from current cheesy and blue scents.
Very masculine scent, reminds me a lot of Mont Blanc perfumes. Smells of leather, bergamot and a slight touch of nutmeg. Its opening is very strong, ideal for fresh seasons like autumn or summer nights. Daily use. My rating is 7 out of 10.
I am happy because after buying it in March 2020, during the lockdown days, I opened it today and it is exactly as I remembered it. Despite the box having another Milan address with a different distributor, I was afraid, but no, the performance and scents are the same. For me, it is perfectly fine as is, it has pleased me again and I am happy. I love this perfume that, with Aurelien Gichard, fits perfectly on my skin and develops its magic in a surprising way.
Final batch of 2022. Two sprays on wrists and neck. First impression: familiar scent, very worn-out. It’s like a Chanel Egoiste Platinum but tacky and generic, closer to a Montblanc Legend EDT which wasn’t a bomb either, but here it is watery with pyrrhic longevity and sillage. In short, a looser scent than a Smurf’s fart. Reformulated down? Seems so. In the bottle, I notice neither longevity nor sillage nor the poetic drivel others mention. I didn’t smell the 2011 version, but surely even a slight effort would have made it better. Trussardi is a veteran Italian company, high-end fashion and accessories. I say this because they care about details and it shows, but with this Uomo 2011 you’ve left a conventional, repetitive perfumín with terrible performance and very boring. If it lasted 4-5 hours with a moderate sillage of 30-45 minutes, I’d give it a pass. As it is today, not even a 5 pence. Fortunately, it’s not very expensive. Although for what it’s worth or a bit more, there are perfumes that kick its arse 100 times. Another little perfume I’ll gift when the time comes for birthdays, Father’s Day, Christmas, etc.
I have the new version and I agree with Bofifa and Molletmod regarding the old edition. It seemed odd to look for similarities with V&A Pour Homme or Fendi Uomo in something fresh and green that initially reminds me of Esika’s Winner Sport and then, in nuances, Ungaro III. Of course, it is a reformulation! The collectors’ nightmare. It’s not a bad perfume, but it should have another name and be separated from the vintage version.